Diretrizes para avaliação e validação do potencial doador de órgãos em morte encefálica / Guidelines for the assessment and acceptance of potential brain-dead organ donors

RESUMO O transplante de órgãos é a única alternativa para muitos pacientes portadores de algumas doenças terminais. Ao mesmo tempo, é preocupante a crescente desproporção entre a alta demanda por transplantes de órgãos e o baixo índice de transplantes efetivados. Dentre as diferentes causas que alimentam essa desproporção, estão os equívocos na identificação do potencial doador de órgãos e as contraindicações mal atribuídas pela equipe assistente. Assim, o presente documento pretende fornecer subsídios à equipe multiprofissional da terapia intensiva para o reconhecimento, a avaliação e a validação do potencial doador de órgãos.

ABSTRACT Organ transplantation is the only alternative for many patients with terminal diseases. The increasing disproportion between the high demand for organ transplants and the low rate of transplants actually performed is worrisome. Some of the causes of this disproportion are errors in the identification of potential organ donors and in the determination of contraindications by the attending staff. Therefore, the aim of the present document is to provide guidelines for intensive care multi-professional staffs for the recognition, assessment and acceptance of potential organ donors.

Portal vein embolization using an adapted hysterosalpingography catheter / Embolização portal utilizando cateter adaptado de histerossalpingografia

BACKGROUND: Portal vein embolization is an accepted procedure that provides hypertrophy of the future remnant liver in order to reduce post-hepatectomy complications. AIM: To present a series submitted to portal vein embolization using an adapted hysterosalpingography catheter via transileocolic route. METHODS: Were performed right portal branch embolization in 19 patients using hysterosalpingography catheter. For embolizing the vessel, was used Gelfoam(r) powder with absolute alcohol solution. Indications for hepatectomy were colorectal liver metastases in all cases. RESULTS: An adequate growth of the future remnant liver was achieved in 15 patients (78.9%) and second time hepatectomy could be done in 14 (73.7%). In one patient (5.2%), tumor progression prevented surgery. One patient presented acute renal failure after portal embolization. CONCLUSIONS: The hysterosalpingography catheter is easy to handle and can be introduced into the portal vein with a wire guide. There were no major post-embolization complication. Its use is safe, cheap and effective. .

RACIONAL: Embolização da veia porta é procedimento consagrado para estimular a hipertrofia do fígado remanescente, a fim de reduzir as complicações pós-hepatectomia. OBJETIVO: Apresentar série de casos submetidos à embolização da veia porta usando cateter adaptado de histerossalpingografia, por via transileocólica. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada embolização do ramo portal direito em 19 pacientes utilizando cateter de histerossalpingografia. Foi usado Gelfoam(r) em pó com solução de álcool absoluto, como material embolizante. As indicações para hepatectomia foram metástases hepáticas colorretais em todos os casos. RESULTADOS: Hipertrofia adequada do fígado remanescente foi alcançada em 15 pacientes (78,9%) e a hepatectomia foi realizada em 14 (73,7 %). Em um (5,2 %), a progressão do tumor impediu a realização da operação. Um paciente apresentou insuficiência renal aguda após embolização portal. CONCLUSÕES: O cateter de histerossalpingografia é fácil de ser manuseado e pode ser introduzido na veia porta com um fio guia. Não houve complicação grave pós-embolização. Seu uso é seguro, barato e eficaz. .

Fulminant hepatitis failure in adults and children from a Public Hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is characterized by massive hepatocellular injury, whose physiopathology is still unclear. Hepatitis B (HBV) is probably the most common viral cause of FHF, while hepatitis A (HAV) virus seem occurs less frequently. However, the host and viral factors that determine the outcome of these infections are poorly understood. In the present study, viral load and genotyping determining regions of HAV and HBV genomes were sequenced. Eight FHF patients and one patient with severe acute hepatitis (SAH) were included. Liver and blood samples were collected during liver transplantation or necropsy procedures. HAV-RNA and HBV-DNA were extracted from serum, biopsy and paraffin liver. Nucleotide sequencing of HAV-RNA was performed from VP1/2A and HBV-DNA from PreS/S region. The amplified samples were quantified by Real-Time PCR. The cases of HAV infection were due to subgenotype IA. The cases of HBV infection were due to genotype A2 and D4. The case of HAV/HBV coinfection was infected by genotype IA and D3. Hepatitis A and B infection were associated with genotypes most prevalent in Brazil. In hepatitis A infection the mean of period evolution was 13 days. In hepatitis B, FHF patients infected by genotype D have a shorter period of evolution than FHF patients infected by genotype A (mean 15 v. 53 days). There was no association with genotype-determining region with the severity of hepatitis, however nucleotide differences and high viral load could be observed among FHF.